Saturday, February 13, 2010

Are you out there, Rod?

My brother, Rod Schneider, has been missing for more than ten years. Tomorrow is his birthday. In the hope that he might happen upon this blog in a googling moment, I am posting something I wrote for him:

Why did you disappear, Rod? When did the rot set in to break the bonds between us? Back in 1980 when you left your first wife and destroyed the business you built with my first husband? Or five years later when you came to France, outraged my second man’s family and ruined my thirtieth birthday party? Who felt worse each time? You, with guilt? Or me, with a sense of betrayal?

I thought we were back on track in 1995 when I visited you in Germany. You were my astonishing baby brother again – intense, moody and occasionally explosive, but as interesting and insightful as you had ever been. I thought we had forgiven each other’s mad moments. Wounded children become wounded adults, don’t they? We had some excuses.

And there we were – me forty, you thirty-eight – both successful and resolved in our own ways. I was a senior public affairs manager in a big corporation. I had two kids and a cute place in an inner Sydney suburb that was gentrifying by the day. Sadly, I didn’t have the relationship side sorted, but you did. You seemed happy with your second wife, Friedericke, and she seemed far warmer than when you’d brought her to my thirtieth birthday debacle. You had made your apartment in an obscure German village gorgeous and gadgety. And you didn’t give a damn that she made the money while you dabbled in astrology, soap-making and software development. We had forged ahead in opposite directions and in some ways we had both reached our peak.

You had always been handsome, in the sort of boy-poet way that made women want to mother and brother you. But now you had matured into a striking wizard of a man – so much so that I didn’t recognise you when you met me at Frankfurt airport. After ten years, I still had a vivid picture of you in my mind, but I hadn’t added long hair and subtracted five kilos. I was standing there waiting for you when a complete stranger took my breath away. He looked like Daniel Day Lewis in The Last of the Mohicans – tall, bony and beautiful with streaming hair of coal, copper and silver. Only as he came close did I see those blue eyes burning into mine and realise that it was you. No one looking on would have imagined I was your sister – I was so different in colouring and tone. My hair was as long but completely copper, my face was girly rather than gaunt, and my manner was as light and airy as yours was intensely focused. Indeed, you looked more like Friedericke’s sister. The snowy-haired Christmas tree angel I remembered from ten years before now mirrored your new starved, scrubbed and androgynous style.

Purposefully, you led us to the train station below the airport and we bought tickets for Saarbrucken. Once we were on our way, you relaxed and we started bouncing ideas off each other the way we used to as teenagers. It was my first time in Germany and I was struck by the brutal edge to the architecture, signage and systems I saw around us. Pointing to a chocolate billboard advertisement, you said that the slogan “quadratisch, praktisch, gut” meant "square, practical, good”. “Where else in the world would people sell chocolate that way?” you asked with a mixture of contempt and admiration. At Saarbrucken, we caught a bus to Lummershied and then walked to your apartment in the basement of a large house. It was decorated beautifully and imaginatively, just as I had expected, but I sensed something dark and forbidding about the place. Your in-laws owned it and lived above you, but there was little contact and even less warmth between the two households. You didn’t introduce me to them for days and only spoke of them in the harshest of terms. But I wasn’t particularly concerned at the time. I shiver now when I think back to the call you made to our sister before you vanished, claiming one of Friedericke’s relatives was threatening your lives.

I presumed you were just being melodramatic. We’re both inclined that way, you have to admit. And it’s perfectly understandable, given our manic genes and depressive upbringing. But you’ve been missing so long, I sometimes imagine that you really were in danger and perhaps the worst happened and you’re dead and no one found your body, or identified it, or knew we existed to inform us.

Deep down, though, I am certain you’re alive and you’ve just cut us off. Maybe you regret that rash decision but can’t bring yourself to reverse it. And that’s the problem – not knowing. For you, that’s probably the point. You want us to suffer. Back in 1995, you kept describing yourself as “cruel but fair”. Sure, it was a line straight out of Monty Python and there was a glint of the old Rod’s cutting wit in the way you used it, but you meant what you said. Nothing is more serious than a joke, is it?

That was one of the life observations we mulled over that cold, wet month of May 1995. For three days we were cooped up inside your apartment, unable to make the excursions you had planned for my visit. Instead you cooked delicious vegan meals, which was an extraordinary feat considering your long list of banned ingredients (meat, animal fats, eggs, dairy products) and your special quirks (like measuring everything to the nanogram and cutting back anything even remotely indulgent). When we ate, I was obliged to drink my wine alone because you never touched the stuff. I even had to buy a corkscrew because you saw no use for such a utensil. Nevertheless, we enjoyed ourselves. We played the occasional game of Scrabble or Five Hundred, but mostly we talked … and talked … and talked.

We discussed every aspect of art from graphic design to grand literature and we plunged into astrology, numerology and tarot to analyse personalities and relationships. I read your cards and you meditated on the natal charts of everyone in my worry basket. I was at a turning point – the classic mid-life crisis – and you were head-butt blunt in your advice. Cruel but fair, you kept on saying.

One comment in particular still haunts me. We talked about regrets. Do you remember? You asked me if I had any regrets and I said I didn’t. I felt I’d done the best I could at every point of my life and the mistakes I’d made were all part of the rich pattern of life. Without pain, how could anyone appreciate pleasure? You shook your head. For you, my answer meant I’d learned nothing and I was doomed to keep stumbling in the dark. My riposte was worthy of Sophocles, I thought back then. “That’s exactly the point!” I said. “I have learned valuable lessons from all of my mistakes. So why regret them? They’ve spurred positive change.”

After all this time, I understand the scornful look on your face when you heard this. I wasn’t facing up to my regrets back then, but I’ve more than made up for that since. I need to tell you about that. I need to talk to you adult to adult. I’ve finally grown up. Menopause has worked magic for me. I see things so much more clearly without the hormonal rages that screwed up my emotions and skewed my judgement.

More importantly, though, there is so much family news you should know. Mum is now living here in Melbourne. Our sister, Marilyn, had a stroke that fried the front part of her brain, but she seems happy and has remarried. There are new babies – Stephen’s and Carmina's daughter and son in Barcelona, Kate’s and Anna's son here in Melbourne. I’ve finally found a solid relationship. John and I have been together for more than eleven years now.

Who would have thought I could do it? Not you. You told me in 1995 that I seduced men with my femininity and then dismayed them with the full story – that I was a harpy, I suppose. You clearly disapproved of my taste in men and most likely how I played the game. They deserved everything I dished out, you said. Cruel as you were, I must admit you were pretty fair in your assessment. And strange as it may sound, I appreciated that.

I miss you, Rod. So do Mum and Marilyn. I can’t hunt you down again. When I tried that, I alienated you even more. So I am writing this. Perhaps you will think of us on your birthday.

This is what i want to tell you – you are more than blood. I would like you whether you were related or not. You have infuriating bad qualities. So do we all. You are intelligent, funny and soulful – the three qualities I demand of friends. I admire your inventiveness, your fine taste and your philosophical depth. I feel protective about you. I cannot like any man without comparing him to you. You were my first real friend. Where are you?

8 comments:

  1. Are you out there Rell?

    At first the posts came almost daily, and then weekly. Alas in time, the intevals grew, a fortnight, a month, and then silence. Is she busy writing? Has she abandoned the blog?

    ReplyDelete
  2. No mate, I don't think she's comming back. Still we have a forum. Maybbe you and I can start posting messages. Who are you? What country are you in? If we started posting interesting comments, we might get a readership. What do you think?

    ReplyDelete
  3. My names Steve and I'm in Boston.

    Is there a way we could broadcast this thread? It would be kinda funny to get a bunch of people squating on the site, passing messages and have the landlady totally in the dark.

    Steve

    ReplyDelete
  4. Too cruel. But also fair, I must admit. Sorry, I've been hiding from writing of late. Other obsessions have crowded in. Back on board now. Go your hardest.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Welcome back and a belated happy birthday. Easter was frantic and so I didn't get online.
    Some time back I prepared a comment in relation to this post, but not knowing whether you'd given up, I decided to leave it. I will dig it out and send it.

    CJS

    ReplyDelete
  6. Oops, wrong date. It's not for another week. Sorry, I was working from memory.

    CJS

    ReplyDelete
  7. Rell,

    I first read your postings as a fellow would-be author, hoping to gain insights into the process of getting published. Since then, your posts have been more personal in nature. Although interesting, I did not want to dominate your replies, and so many times I have held back from answering. You painted a vivid picture of yourself, and it has been interesting to fill in the gaps. In doing this, I have also gained some small insights into my own motivations.

    Early on I saw in your posts, an apparent contradiction. I had no problem accepting that an intelligent professional might read tarot cards; I too have had mystical experiences. No, the contradiction was in the flame you held for Heathcliff. You are obviously a woman of independent spirit. Your Svengali tale shows you are not some insecure teenager, to be easily swayed by powerful men. So why Heathcliff? Let me put him into focus. He lost Cathy to Linton. We’ve all lost in love, but only an adolescent is so bitter, as to think of revenge. She made her own choice and Linton acted as any man would. Still, Heathcliff decided to seek revenge. Not content with hating Linton, he expanded his sphere of bitterness to Isabella, and sought to destroy her. Her only crime was to be Linton’s sister. And as if that was not enough, he hanged her pet dog. Its crime was to be owned by Isabella. He is not some romantic free soul, unshackled by the constraints that bind most civilised people. Rather he is an immature and dangerously embittered loony.

    Many men are selfish and callous. Many will lie to get what they want, but I’ve never known one who actually engaged in a relationship with the express purpose of causing pain. When Isabella was deluded enough to love Heathcliff, he accused her of projecting upon him, qualities that he lacked. So how is it that you had become Isabella?

    In one of your first posts you stated that we fall for a partner who represents our parent of the opposite sex. This is close to the truth, but not completely accurate.
    Rod is your first friend. You were children together, like Heathcliff and Cathy. By being raised together, they were virtually brother and sister, and so their relationship was as incestuous as it was impetuous. Replace the moors of England with country Ipswich and the picture fits well. As with Heathcliff and Cathy, you grew up and went your separate ways. Heathcliff then turned against Cathy, because she had chosen Linton. Rod turned against you, and made his disparaging remarks about the men in your life. Was he jealous of them?

    Physically he turned into a striking wizard of a man, a picture not unlike the dark brooding Heathcliff. He described himself as cruel. How many men willing embrace that adjective? Heathcliff would.

    A story is a Rorschach inkblot into which we impose patterns. Perhaps I have seen shapes that are not there. Still it is uncanny that so many of your posts provide clues. Read as a whole your posts have a novel-like structure, the clues are given early, and then the mystery is presented. The reader is left to find the solution in those early clues.

    And now as you write, we see similarities between Rod and you. Being myself a flawed person, I would never have guessed you to be damaged. You looked to be the very model of success. You state that damaged children become damaged adults, and hint that this applies to both you and Rod. He dropped out of the commercial world and made scented soap. It was difficult to see him making a good living this way. You too have dropped out to write your novel. The siblings continue to walk parallel paths.
    I hope in writing these thoughts, I have not caused offence.

    CJS

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hello CJS, welcome back to you too. Your comments are always deeply insightful and, frankly, somewhat shocking. I don't know where to start to respond to this. You have struck a chord with me, but I don't like the sound. Please allow me to reflect before I pronounce.

    ReplyDelete